Man Reflects on Andrej Karpathy's Predictions About How Knowing How to Use AI Will Divide Society: ‘Give it 5 years. How many of those 80% will still be congratulating themselves for being too wise and righteous to use AI?’

This entire AI debate has become a battle over Intellectual Identity and styleThe AI vs. SI debate has made us question what it means to be human, to write like a human, or to work as a human. Once bots and agents took over our jobs or significantly changed the way we do them, we started wondering what we bring to the table.Both being technologically enthusiastic and being skeptical can be ways of oversimplifying the issue. Are we using AI, or using it to prove we're smarter than everyone else? Who is right? People who say we need to learn to work and live with it, or people who say we should focus on making our human capabilities more valuable to stand out in a world full of slop?I personally think both parties are right, but not in the way you think. We should definitely embrace AI as an assistant at work, except when our job is something that doesn't require AI at all. But I'm also one of those people who think that since AI arrived, human-made stuff has become more valuable, and true creativity has proven itself as un-mimicable by a machine.AI is known for rapidly changing and evolving, so learning everything about it today wouldn't be a little paradoxical? All of that, in two…

≈